AV receiver sucks with analog input...

Discussion in 'Hi-Fi and General Audio' started by michaelab, Jul 20, 2003.

  1. michaelab

    michaelab desafinado

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,403
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Lisbon, Portugal
    Was watching the MTV dance chart this morning and for decent stuff broadcast in stereo I usually pipe it through my AV receiver (Marantz SR4200). However, it just sounded so horrible. One dimensional, muffled bass, no image to speak of. It's a toss up whether it was any better than the TVs internal speakers.

    So, as an experiment I tried connecting the output from my TV straight into my Arcam A22....WOW! So much better :eek:

    Bear in mind I use my Arcam as a 'power' amp for the front speakers for my SR4200 already so it was really just the preamp/processing section of the SR4200 that was mudering the sound.

    The only reason I had the TV connected via the SR4200 was so that I could watch the occasional programme in DPLII surround but even that isn't anything like as good as straight stereo through my Arcam.

    Fortunately, the SR4200 seems to do a lot better with digital inputs and watching DD5.1 or DTS movies with it is pretty good :MILD:

    Michael.
     
    michaelab, Jul 20, 2003
    #1
  2. michaelab

    amazingtrade Mad Madchestoh fan

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    5,139
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Manchester
    I have my TV and DVD conneted to my PM6010OSE and it sound really quite good, I have no sub woofer, but the bass on action films has a lot of attack and grunt (a sub woofer would help things but my £50 gale makes things ten times worse so its no longer in use).

    I my mates got some crappy imported 5:1 system with crappy speakers, it may be surround sound but it sounds so compressed and closed in its awful, me admited that my stereo system sounded better than his even for movies.

    I guess recievers are not designed for analogue inputs, although the way things are going they should work well with them. I mean the amount of people that will but a £150 dvd. £250 reciever and use it as there main stereo.

    Although personaly if I ever got into home cinema I would keep my stereo system and souround system seperate.

    Its interesting though as I though the SR4200 was supposed to be good on for stereo CD input music, buy then its only a £200 amp from Richers so I guess it cannot really sound anything like as good a similary priced stereo amp.

    Well at least you have your arcam, I remember before I had a nicam TV, I feeded into my old Ariston AX910 and even that sounded better than some built in speakers on nicam tvs.

    Sorry for the woffle.
     
    amazingtrade, Jul 20, 2003
    #2
  3. michaelab

    Ian J

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    77
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Midlands
    The problem with AV amps like the Marantz SR4200 and others in that price range is that they are designed to appeal to the sort of person that puts the number of facilities higher up the desirability scale than sonic performance.

    AV is still in the novelty stage and unfortunately the ability to decode hundreds of different formats and switch video signals is deemed as important as sonic performance and as much of the equipment is price sensitive, quality suffers.

    Hopefully as the market matures, more attention will be paid to sound reproduction at the expense of unnecessary bells & whilstles and a budget AV receiver will become available that will also sound musical.

    Or am I being too optimistic
     
    Ian J, Jul 20, 2003
    #3
  4. michaelab

    Hex Spurt

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2003
    Messages:
    432
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Cheshire
    Yep, you're being waaaay toooo optomistic :D Entry level punters buy whistles and bells. The more a product has then the better it sells.

    michaelab, get a grip man!!
    You're comparing an AV amp that digitises it's analogue inputs and gives you:
    5 x 70W power amps
    a pre-amp with god knows how many inputs including 2 electrical and two optical, two tape loops,
    video switching for composite and S-Video
    DSP chips for decoding all the main surround sound formats
    an FM/AM tuner with 30 presets
    multibrand remote control -- all for for £400 list (discounted to less than £300 at end of life) against a £1000 dedicated 2 channel HiFi amp with what 4 (?) inputs and an optional MM/MC board, and you're surprised the Arcam sounds better??!! :rolleyes: Of course it sounds better - I'd be fecking livid if the Arcam didn't wipe the floor with any AV amp up to £2000 - it bloody well should!! :D :D
     
    Hex Spurt, Jul 20, 2003
    #4
  5. michaelab

    michaelab desafinado

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,403
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Lisbon, Portugal
    Of course the Arcam is better Hex, but I was surprised just how bad the SR4200 is at stereo with analog inputs. It's quite a while since I used it like that but I don't remember it being that bad.

    Now, something I haven't really dared to do yet but I will tomorrow, is set my DVD player to PCM output and pipe it through my DAC (Tag DAC20, but Chord DAC64 arriving tomorrow :p ) and see just how good something like Lord of the Rings is in stereo alone - I'm not sure I'm prepared to deal with the results :cry:

    Michael.
     
    michaelab, Jul 21, 2003
    #5
  6. michaelab

    MO! MOnkey`ead!

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2003
    Messages:
    4,881
    Likes Received:
    0
    Make sure you also set the DVD to output a downmixed signal. I tried sending a full 5.1 through my DAC and it wasn't pretty!

    CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK CLIck click click.............
     
    MO!, Jul 21, 2003
    #6
  7. michaelab

    michaelab desafinado

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,403
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Lisbon, Portugal
    Right - did the comparison: DVD player PCM into Tag DAC20 into the Arcam vs. DD5.1 surround with the SR4200 (front channels played via the Arcam using pre-outs as I've always done).

    Two choice scenes from LOTR (Liv Tyler with Frodo, on horseback being chased by the Nazgul and the Balrog "You Shall not PASS" scene :) ).

    Surround won hands down (phew!). First off, the SR4200 is a lot better with digital inputs and secondly, the things you notice as being cr@p when just listening to music are not nearly so apparent in movies and the advantages of surround in adding ambience space and, of course, the 5.1 effects far outweigh the loss in quality (which wasn't even that apparent in this test :eek: )

    Panic over :cool:

    Michael.
     
    michaelab, Jul 22, 2003
    #7
  8. michaelab

    wadia-miester Mighty Rearranger

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,026
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Beyond the 4th Dimension
    Mike make sure when your using the Dac 64, to switch the time buffer off when using the dvd through it :D makes for intresting film watching :)
     
    wadia-miester, Jul 22, 2003
    #8
  9. michaelab

    domfjbrown live & breathe psy-trance

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2003
    Messages:
    2,641
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Exeter (not quite Cornwall!)
    :D :D :D :D

    ...or how to replicate a Sony xx5 (especially 325 and 525) series DVD player - one of the worst pieces of crap I've ever had the misfortune to own - had one for 3 years and the thing nearly killed my enjoyment of watching films...

    Roll on end of month when I can get a Pioneer 656A DVD :)
     
    domfjbrown, Jul 22, 2003
    #9
  10. michaelab

    michaelab desafinado

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,403
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Lisbon, Portugal
    I knew about that little gotcha Tone :D but I used the DAC20 for the test because I don't have any BNC/RCA adapters and my DVD player(s) only have RCA digi outputs.

    Michael.
     
    michaelab, Jul 22, 2003
    #10
  11. michaelab

    bottleneck talks a load of rubbish

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,766
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    bucks
    Now we know how they generate the dialogue lag in martial arts films!

    :D
     
    bottleneck, Jul 22, 2003
    #11
  12. michaelab

    wadia-miester Mighty Rearranger

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,026
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Beyond the 4th Dimension
    Mike when your over next I'll send you a couple, I have a few lying about mate. WM
    PS I feel It's about time your told Z/G about your new toy Mr Boss sir :D I like the colour change BTW
     
    wadia-miester, Jul 22, 2003
    #12
  13. michaelab

    michaelab desafinado

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,403
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Lisbon, Portugal
    Cheers Tone - rest assured a post will be forthcoming in the next few hours... :D

    Michael.
     
    michaelab, Jul 22, 2003
    #13
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Similar Threads
There are no similar threads yet.
Loading...