[Review] Marantz PM6010OSE

Discussion in 'Hi-Fi and General Audio' started by amazingtrade, Jul 12, 2003.

  1. amazingtrade

    amazingtrade Mad Madchestoh fan

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    5,139
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Manchester
    Marantz PM6010OSE

    I just thought I would write about my 7 months ownership of my Marantz PM6010OSE.

    Background info:

    I am student and don't have much money however I have been building up a HIFI seperates system since 1999. My first amp was an Ariston AX910, then a Marantz PM4000 and now the 6010OSE. This review will be comparing the amp to the Marantz PM4000 and the Denon 255SE UK two amps which I also have expereince with at a similar price point.

    Sound Quality

    The sound is rather snappy but at the same time smooth, there is high detail levels and you don't feel like you are missing very much, this does not sound like a low end product, more of a low end mid range product. The timing is spot on, the vocals are very open and convey the realism you would expect from a decent amp. The bass however is slightly lacking compared to the Denon 255SE UK. I am not particualy a bass fan though, I like speed above anything else and cheap sub £100 sub woofers frankly scare me.

    Spin some Simon and Garfunkel such as Bleaker Street or Sounds of Silence and this amp really shines, both Simon's and Garfunkel's voice really shine through, every pluck of the guitar is relayed and it sounds brillaint.

    REM's automatic for the people on 12" vynil also sounds very good. Though the amp lacks a bit of bass, the timing is so accurate that dance music still sounds very good, and a lot of my mates who have mini systems comment on how good the bass is. So unless you really much feel every beat then you should be able to live with the bass fine.

    Compared to the PM4000 this amp holds not much back, its a lot more revealing, this is a bad thing on poor records btw, but the biggest thing you will notice is how much more dymanic and snappy the sound is, I assume this due to the extra 20wpc in power. The Denon probably has a bit deeper bass, but the vocals don't sound as natural and the Denon sounds a tad harsh to me.


    Features

    The PM6010OSE is in between the PM4000 and Denon. Oddly the PM4000 has much more features, however some of these get in the away of sound quality, the PM6010OSE has a good quality switch for input selection rather than the relay driven system of the PM4000. The downside to this is unlike the PM4000 the input selection cannot be controlled via remote control, in fact all the PM6010's remote control does is control the volume.

    The Denon has no remote control but has tone controls unlike the PM6010SE however I am sure most of you will agree that if you need to use tone controls there is somthing wrong. For example the system downstairs boomed like mad, instead of using the tone controls to fix this I by-passed them and inserted socks in the pass ports which worked just as well without the signal loss.

    Price

    The PM6010OSE can be picked up for around £150 new now, making it a very good bargain as they cost £230 when they were introduced in August 1999.

    The Denon can be bought for around £120, and the PM4200 (the replacement for the PM4000) for £130.

    Conclusion

    The Marantz PM6010OSE is a very good buy for the money, and will give any sub £100 amp a run for its money. The PM6010OSE has a solid metal chasis, a darlington transistor arrangement, and a semi (i.e still only one power supply) dual mono layout. Listen this amp first but you may well like it.
     
    amazingtrade, Jul 12, 2003
    #1
  2. amazingtrade

    BlueMax

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2003
    Messages:
    878
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    South Coast of UK
    I have heard that Marantz PM6010OSE sounds even better when carefully placed on a TNT FLEXY.

    It is also one of the rare breed of amplifiers that can supply excellent signals for HEADPHONES.


    :JPS:
     
    BlueMax, Sep 21, 2003
    #2
  3. amazingtrade

    PBirkett VTEC Addict

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2003
    Messages:
    2,456
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    The Toon
    Yep, along with Rotel and NAD amps. Its such a shame that many manufacturers either dismiss headphone sockets completely, or make them so bad they might as well not have one anyway.

    A good speaker amp should be able to drive headphones without any problems (even relatively hard to drive ones).

    Someone recently on headfi told me his Rotel amp was comparable to a Sugden Headmaster for driving headphones.

    Any decent amp worth its salt and has a headphone socket *SHOULD* be able to drive headphones very well. If it cant, then I would have little confidence in it as a product...
     
    PBirkett, Sep 21, 2003
    #3
  4. amazingtrade

    amazingtrade Mad Madchestoh fan

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    5,139
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Manchester
    I haven't really tried it with any other similary priced amps on the headphones so I wouldn't know, however my headphones have much greater control going through the amp than when they were plugged into my TV as test.

    I also believe that the phono stages in Marantz amps are good quality compared to ones found in Sony items.
     
    amazingtrade, Sep 22, 2003
    #4
  5. amazingtrade

    amazingtrade Mad Madchestoh fan

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    5,139
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Manchester
    Bump
     
    amazingtrade, Dec 11, 2003
    #5
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.