Lt Cdr Data
om
got a choice between a gyrodek dc, or an origin live ultra, about the same price, which one? help...
Originally posted by SimonConnell
Gyro. Though I've not got any evidence to hand, I've heard a few bad things about OL's quality control. Also, look at the two companies conceptions of a modified Rega. Michell have the Tecnoarm, a perfectly executed piece of design that's been very well thought out. OL have the modified RB250/300, with easy-to-manufacture but relatively poor sounding 3-piece wiring, and an aftermarket counterweight that's made to relatively poor tolerances (Rega's own was a fair bit better). I know who I'd choose.
Originally posted by Lt Cdr Data
well the ol rb 250 was better than that godawful 250 alone, but points noted, of course you are probably right.
go on, name the magI know which you mean. I suspect the ed. is getting freebees.
Originally posted by SCIDB
I saw the review with the arms & it was interesting. As for the Origin Live arm being better that the SME, I don't know. I have only heard it at a show. The equipment & surroundings were unknowmn to me. The only way to find out would be to listen in more controlled enviroments. I must admit, by looking at it, my vote goes to the SME. From what I remember from the reviews, it didn't seem that the Origin Live was a clearout winner. It was down to personal preference. If I had done the review maybe the SME would have come out on top.
SCIDB
Originally posted by Lawrie
SCIDB,
I saw that review as well as that was one of the mags I picked up at the airport. Did you notice anything strange about that review and the verdict?Just to recap (from memory here as I don't have the magazine in front of me) the arms reviewed were: Origin Live OL1, Origin Live Silver, Origin Live Illustrious (have I left out any more Origin Live arms?
) Linn Ekos, Roksan Nima, SME IV, Hadcock GH242 or something similar etc, etc. Now, what I couldn't understand as this may have influenced the results was why the reviewer chose to use the Origin Live Aurora Gold turntable to review the arms instead of using a neutral deck. Oh, I know why! According to him, he used the OL Aurora deck because - wait for this - "it is the most neutral deck available right now". I can still see the page (in my head) on which that comment was written. Now, forgive me for being cynical here but is it any wonder then that the Origin Live Illustrious tonearm took the Gold from that review especially when used with a deck from the same stable? I wonder which arm would have been considered the best if the SME10 turntable had been used instead. Reviews eh, who needs 'em?
![]()
You must bear in mind that the Gyrodec is not perfect, other decks will do things as good or better.
Originally posted by Uncle Ants
You memory and mine match, and yes I did think "Hmmmm" that gives the OL offerings a bit of an unfair advantage, but then (as always with the mags), you sort of take in what you are reading with this in the back of your mind. The other strange thing being that OL had a number of arms in the test and everyone else got one![]()