In my system (PMC MB2, Rega Apollo cd player):
Bryston 4B-ST's pluses:
• Gives the illusion of greater top end clarity
• Better timbre and rawness around acoustic instruments: sounds closer to the actual instrument
• Warranty and customer service are simply unbeatable: the company has a no BS approach
4B-ST minuses:
• Slightly hard on the upper mids/ not the most refined amp in that area
• Bass was boomy and slightly dry
• Sound stage is smaller with lesser detail
• Lesser emotional engagement
Kw550 pluses:
• Sound stage is comparatively huge, effortless, with distinctly more detail and focus; almost a kilowatt of power per channel has very noticeable benefits
• More emotional and musical involvement; smoother and relaxed
• Bass is now very good; deep, controlled and 'palpable'
• The kw weighs more than twice the 4b (which may be a + or a -)
Kw550 minuses:
• Doesn't give the illusion of top end clarity like the Bryston
• Timbre, texture and rawness of individual acoustic instruments is not as good (though the amp is still breaking in)
• Cheesy glowing feet and gimmicky marketing
• Smoother, overall improved vocals than the 4B, but lacking immediacy
The PMC's are brilliant speakers and need a lot of clean power, which is tricky if you're on a budget; adding the kw has made them suddenly come to life and very enjoyable. They were being a little frustrating with the single 4B. Brystons are great gear, and I'm a big fan, but the cost in the UK is exactly twice what they're worth (~GBP 5k for the 14B plus probably a couple grand more for the BP26). The MF cost GBP 2.5k brand new. No contest in terms of money.
Overall, the 4B is suitable if you're using the system for monitoring, while the kw is better if the system is used for pleasure. A single 3B is inadequate.
Brizon, I hunted on the 2nd hand market for a tri-amp solution for months with no luck. Activation is the best solution, but too expensive for me at the moment. The journey continues while the bank accounts break.