MO!
MOnkey`ead!
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2003
- Messages
- 4,881
- Reaction score
- 1
Spotted this in the latest astalavista newsletter.
[ A NEW SECURITY PRODUCT ATTACKS THE ATTACKERS ]
Symbiot, a Texas-based security company, plans to release a corporate defense system that fights back against distributed denial-of-service and hacker attacks by launching counterstrikes. Symbiot, located in Austin, said it bases its theory on the military doctrine of "necessity and proportionality," which means that the response to an attack is proportionate to the attack's ferocity.
More information is available at:
http://news.com.com/2100-7349_3-5172032.html
http://news.zdnet.co.uk/internet/security/0,39020375,39148215,00.htm
Astalavista's comments:
Attractive to be aware of military theory, but as far as DDoS attacks are concerned, this is probably the worst thing you could do since it will expand the impact of the DDoS attack by attacking the hacker's anonymous hosts, which are unaware home and enterprise users all over the world.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I like the way they compare it to military thinking.
"by attacking the hacker's anonymous hosts, which are unaware home and enterprise users all over the world."
Innocent normal people caught in the line of fire when going for an attacker.
Sound Familiar???
[ A NEW SECURITY PRODUCT ATTACKS THE ATTACKERS ]
Symbiot, a Texas-based security company, plans to release a corporate defense system that fights back against distributed denial-of-service and hacker attacks by launching counterstrikes. Symbiot, located in Austin, said it bases its theory on the military doctrine of "necessity and proportionality," which means that the response to an attack is proportionate to the attack's ferocity.
More information is available at:
http://news.com.com/2100-7349_3-5172032.html
http://news.zdnet.co.uk/internet/security/0,39020375,39148215,00.htm
Astalavista's comments:
Attractive to be aware of military theory, but as far as DDoS attacks are concerned, this is probably the worst thing you could do since it will expand the impact of the DDoS attack by attacking the hacker's anonymous hosts, which are unaware home and enterprise users all over the world.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I like the way they compare it to military thinking.
"by attacking the hacker's anonymous hosts, which are unaware home and enterprise users all over the world."
Innocent normal people caught in the line of fire when going for an attacker.
Sound Familiar???