Black gate caps and vishay bulk foil resistors

Discussion in 'DIY Discussion' started by anon_bb, Jun 21, 2005.

  1. anon_bb

    anon_bb Honey Badger

    Joined:
    May 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,804
    Likes Received:
    0
    Black gate caps and vishay bulk foil resistors - is it possible to do better for less? The cost of replacing all the parts in my phono, headamp and preamp would cost about £1200! Do audiophile passive parts (i.e. not opamps) really make a difference? If so how much improvement have people found in practice?

    Regards,

    Nick.
     
    anon_bb, Jun 21, 2005
    #1
  2. anon_bb

    ChrisPa

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2004
    Messages:
    179
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Saddleworth
    Good question! Succinctly phrased. I'd like to know the answer too.
     
    ChrisPa, Jun 21, 2005
    #2
  3. anon_bb

    wadia-miester Mighty Rearranger

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,026
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Beyond the 4th Dimension
    The fun is in finding out for yourself, not always the Accepted gives the most sonically appealing results.
     
    wadia-miester, Jun 21, 2005
    #3
  4. anon_bb

    Anex Thermionic

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    Messages:
    1,434
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    London
    Don't put vishays everywhere, theres no point, just put them at crucial points in the audio signal. You can use any other accurate resistor elsewhere (e.g. RIAA filter etc.) welwyn precision films are good for that, RS sell them. But yes, vishay are expensive.
    Yes they can make it sound like you have bought a new amp/phono/whatever but it probably depends what your putting them into really. The more components in something, the less difference you will gain from changing one or two parts but doing all should still yield good results. Simpler amps mean each component has a greater overall effect so doing things a bit at a time should give you good results as you go.
     
    Anex, Jun 21, 2005
    #4
  5. anon_bb

    wadia-miester Mighty Rearranger

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,026
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Beyond the 4th Dimension
    The fun is in finding out for yourself, not always the Accepted gives the most sonically appealing results.
    £1200 is still cheap for the pre-amp in the world though Nick, Just think A Nagra is £26K, seems like £1200 is a bit of a bargin to me!!!
     
    wadia-miester, Jun 21, 2005
    #5
  6. anon_bb

    anon_bb Honey Badger

    Joined:
    May 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,804
    Likes Received:
    0
    components

    WM - Indeed, I never take the accepted wisdom at face value. You know that already ;) :JOEL: However only a very foolish man doesnt research what has been done previosuly before commencing. Its fun to find out for yourself but no one man can try every component in existence. Which ones do you prefer?

    Yes £1200 is quite cheap in high end terms compared with the nagra but if I can get the same or better results for even less - say £400, then even better. I guess my pre and phono have cost me £1k a piece so far and the headamp maybe £350.

    The number of parts is low. At £7 each it would 160 parts. Half of which go into the balanced stepped attenuator. I already use welwyn there. I guess I could miss that out as half the expense is effectively being spent just to alter one component in the signal path.
     
    anon_bb, Jun 21, 2005
    #6
  7. anon_bb

    penance Arrogant Cock

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2003
    Messages:
    6,004
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Bristol - armpit of the west.
    Never takes wisdom would be more accurate:rolleyes:
     
    penance, Jun 21, 2005
    #7
  8. anon_bb

    anon_bb Honey Badger

    Joined:
    May 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,804
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have no problem with wisdom - just a problem with dogma ;)
     
    anon_bb, Jun 21, 2005
    #8
  9. anon_bb

    penance Arrogant Cock

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2003
    Messages:
    6,004
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Bristol - armpit of the west.
    what ever you say Lord Billybong:rolleyes:
     
    penance, Jun 21, 2005
    #9
  10. anon_bb

    LiloLee Blah, Blah, Blah.........

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2003
    Messages:
    789
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Maidenhead, Berkshire
    Don't use Black Gates anywhere except the PSU.
    Use DynamiCaps caps in signal path.
    Only use Oscon in digital.
    Try to avoid electrolytics.
    If you have to use them bypass them.

    Try Riken resistors.

    Ignore everything above if you want ;)
     
    LiloLee, Jun 21, 2005
    #10
  11. anon_bb

    Anex Thermionic

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    Messages:
    1,434
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    London
    That is exactly where you DO want to use them
     
    Anex, Jun 21, 2005
    #11
  12. anon_bb

    NRG

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2005
    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have found the FG caps from Nichicon are comparable in performance to BG Standards.

    http://www.nichicon.co.jp/english/seihin/pdfs/e-fg.pdf

    IMHO Resistors are a lottery, I would not populate with all of the same type. I would use the vishays in the signal path (S102), the VTA series is also very good, still expensive but not as much as the S102.

    I don't rate Holco's. The Rikens are good as well if you want to add 'colour'. All depends on application.
     
    NRG, Jun 21, 2005
    #12
  13. anon_bb

    hifikrazy

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2004
    Messages:
    244
    Likes Received:
    0
    As aluded to already usually specific components make more difference than others, so blindly replacing the lot can end up being overly expensive for not much gain. Of course knowing where best to place them is the hard part. Trial and error usually. Close resistor tolderance matching often pays dividends in applicable places. Capacitors are the most audible parts in my experience. Also worthwhile looking at recticification (schottky dioides) and maybe even shielding in a pre-amp.

    Nichicon KZ series are fantastic caps. As are the Fine Gold mentioned above. The Blackgate non-polarised (N/NX) jobs work well in coupling apps. And the FK types work well in PS. Panasonic FC type is OK for replacing tired old caps but not really and upgrade.
     
    hifikrazy, Jun 22, 2005
    #13
  14. anon_bb

    I-S Good Evening.... Infidel

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2003
    Messages:
    4,842
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    In a world of pain
    I have made measured differences in performance with different caps and differences between "new" and "burned in" caps of the same type and batch.

    My picks for cheaper than BG but good caps for decoupling purposes...

    Panasonic FC
    Rubycon ZA
    Elna RJH

    I used a mixture of ZA and RJH in a superDAC and it certainly ended up sounding better than my own Oscon/Starget mix.

    If you're designing, however, you can get ceramic 1206 caps up to quite high values now (47uF or so) which is more than enough for audio IC decoupling, so I would tend to go for 1 or 10uF per rail per chip bypassed with an 0603 100nF, and a few larger value electrolytics spread around (depending on board and IC layout).
     
    I-S, Jun 22, 2005
    #14
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.