EQ options for OSX

RobHolt

Moderator
Joined
Oct 23, 2004
Messages
4,126
Reaction score
12
So you like iTunes on the mac but want access to a decent graphic or parametric EQ.
On the face of it you have two options. Use the standard iTunes EQ or use an external processor such as our very own, brilliant, high performance, stunning value Audiosmile DEQ2496 :)

Ok, iTunes graphic EQ sucks because it is far too limited and can only apply coarse correction, and not everyone wants an external box. However, lurking within OSX are an array of excellent EQ plug-ins, provided so that both Apple and 3rd party audio applications can use them.

Why can't iTunes access them?
Good question but you'll need to ask Apple why they built probably their most widely used piece of software to use a different standard.

What you need is a host program running in the background and able to call on the various plug-ins. One of the better examples is Audio Hijack Pro from Rogue Amoeba http://www.rogueamoeba.com/audiohijackpro/

The Demo version is free but a licence is only £20 and it gives you a very useful range of functions in addition to allowing the use of EQ. Essentially, you run the software in monitor mode and 'insert' plug-ins as required. You can use as many as you wish for combined effects and the program will work with a variety of standards including the popular VST. There are some 25 standard Apple plug-ins and a host of others. While we are primarily interested in the EQ options, others exist to influence, for example, dynamics and image placement.

One particular add-on is apQualizr http://www.apulsoft.ch/apqualizr/ allowing a whole array of filters to be inserted and manipulated in real time with an impressive interface. Unfortunately it isn't a free app and will cost you £50 but you might find it good value given the functionality and interface.

Some screen shots:



On firing up AHP you need to navigate to the effects window having selected the input source, in this case iTunes. You'll be presented with the page below and by clicking within any of the squared areas you'll bring up an effects menu. Select the effect you require and it auto inserts. Select the 'Editor' button to make any changes to the plugin.
Here I've got three running, Graphic EQ, Parametric EQ and apQualizr:


Effectswindow.jpg



Once in edit mode, you'll see something like this. Here are the edit views for GEQ & PEQ:


EQoptions.jpg



Lastly, here is the apQualizr edit screen and as you can see, a number of the most common filters are available as presets, though of course each can be fully edited.


apQualizr.jpg




So I hope that gives a taste of what you can do.

On the thorny subject of achieving bit perfect replay and the importance of such things, that will remain for the end user to decide, though clearly any software that digitally manipulates the source signal cannot by definition be bit perfect if you take the source file as the reference.
Our view is simply this. Studios and artists use such manipulation every day and the effects are multi-layered. They take the view that the end result justifies the means, i.e. you'd rather listen to a quality, balanced mix than a bunch of raw signal feeds committed to disc 'as is'.
You must make the same decision. You can go to any lengths you wish in order to achieve bit perfect playback, or you can make your own judgment call and determine that perhaps some EQ to counter room (or speaker) effects is a more desirable compromise. Depends on you and your particular situation, listening environment and attitude to such things.

Of course an effective and reliable means of measuring the audio system and room response is a very useful, though not essential adjunct to any EQ solution. Options for OSX are strictly limited but fortunately a cracking program exists in the form of FuzzMeasure Pro. More on that in part 2.

Doubtless there are alternatives to the solutions described here, so please post details of any that you've found to work well.
 
A brilliant post Rob :) Nice picture too.

I use a tablet PC as my main source these days, so it makes absolute sense to me that room EQ be applied at the source. Audio hijack seems a good way to do it.

That said I need a DAC anyhow, so I just use the AudioSmile DEQ2496, lol.

Doing things this way will allow the use of any DAC/Pre-amp with a computer source and you can apply corrective room EQ without dedicated processor hardware. This is what we are planing to do when AudioSmile exhibit at the National Sudio Show.



*I have heard in the past that Windows is not so suited as Linux or OSX for 'pipipg' audio, but then since I played with such things Windows 7 has come out. I'd hope the quality of the audio isn't reduced using such software. I guess it can be tested by anyone wanting to do so by using the hijack program without any plug-ins inserted.
 
A little update on this.

Audio Hijack Pro preserves source bit depth and sampling rate.
I'd half expected say a 24/96 file to be output at 16/44 or 16/48 after the EQ process but the software seems to retain the native file attributes.

It will also work with audiophile players such as BitPerfect - you simply set BitPerfect as the input source program instead of iTunes.

So no excuse not to have a go :)
 
Hi Rob

Thanks very much for posting this. I have an upcoming need for DEQ, and also have Audio Hijack Pro which I use for recording audio streams.

I knew this could be done in theory, but hadn't got around to working out how.

AHP is currently headed for my MacBook.
 
Dave, let us know how you get on, and if you come across any alternatives we can add them to the thread.
 
Well, I have AHP working between iTunes and the KingRex on my office system as I write.

Easy-peasy! And doesn't seem to mess up the sound

I'll try installing it on the big rig and report back.
 
I have AHP running on my main rig. After a few evenings' listening and a bit of handholding as far as likely settings are concerned, I have five instances of AUParametric running, and I'm in love!

I can hear no distortion, muddying or any other nasties, and I have a slightly cleaner sound in the room with the EQ on.

I haven't yet paid out the £50 for the other plug-in. I probably will later, but at the moment, the big rig is sounding fantastic.
 
Excellent news Dave and thanks for reporting back.
The end result is what counts IMO and lightly used EQ done in the digital domain is way less destructive than some of the old analogue methods. Often it is wholly beneficial.
 
Back
Top