Help! Mad Incatech Volume Pot!!!

Discussion in 'Hi-Fi and General Audio' started by danza, Oct 27, 2004.

  1. danza

    danza

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2004
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi all,

    My Incatech Claymore arrived today. I can only say I'm totally amazed by the sound this baby produces, but anyway, back onto the subject...

    The guy I purchased it from replaced the volume pot, which originally was an Alps model, but as he couldn't find an Alps at as cheap a price as I could, I agreed to have it with a standard effort pot fitted. The pot in it is a 10k log type. I am not sure whether this is correct though. I say this because it takes less than 1/10th of a turn to reach almost full volume from zero output, and any higher, I reckon damage to the speakers will occur. Even in the 'zero' position I can hear quiet music when it is playing!

    My speakers have a sensitivity of 87db/W/m. Could it be that the pot is the incorrect value, and I need something with higher resistance, or is it that the Claymore is just dang powerful?

    Any advice greatfully received dudes,

    Danza
     
    danza, Oct 27, 2004
    #1
  2. danza

    TonyL Club Krautrock Plinque

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    1,613
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Another pink world
    That sounds very wrong to me. I had a Claymore knocking around a couple of years ago and the volume control was very nicely balanced, IIRC about 9.30-10 o'clock gave a reasonable listening level off CD and about 11-12 o'clock from the (excellent) MC stage.

    It might be worth duplicating your post over on pfm as Colin Wonfor does occasionally read the place – I remember asking something and shortly afterwards getting a very helpful email off him (sadly I've lost his contact details). He will still service the Inca Tech stuff if you can track him down, IIRC he lives somewhere in the wilds of Scotland. The Claymore is as you describe - a really good amp.

    Tony.
     
    TonyL, Oct 27, 2004
    #2
  3. danza

    danza

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2004
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    Cheers Tony,

    I've posted everywhere; PFM, HFC, Audioasylum. Hopefully someone has an answer!!!

    Danza
     
    danza, Oct 28, 2004
    #3
  4. danza

    technobear Ursine Audiophile

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    2,099
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Glastonbury
    As it's a log pot, this sounds like the pot is wired back to front. The end that should be the input signal is connected to ground and the end that should be ground is connected to the input signal. The output signal is I hope taken from the wiper.
     
    technobear, Oct 28, 2004
    #4
  5. danza

    danza

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2004
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi Technobear,

    I would've thought that the pot would only go in one way anyway-the pins are on the bottom of it, and if it's resituated as you say, won't it be the wrong way round? I'm confused.

    Ta
     
    danza, Oct 28, 2004
    #5
  6. danza

    technobear Ursine Audiophile

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    2,099
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Glastonbury
    One would hope they all go the same way round. The behaviour you describe suggests that it is the wrong way round though, that's all. Do you have a multimeter? You could measure the resistance of each side at the half way mark. The top end should have considerably higher resistance than the bottom end.
    This behaviour would not be caused by fitting the wrong size (say 10k instead of 47k).
     
    technobear, Oct 28, 2004
    #6
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.