YNMOAN
Trade - AudioFlat
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2007
- Messages
- 674
- Reaction score
- 0
I notice that one quite often reads posts regarding the improvement of stereo imagery and depth. The responses often centre around room setup and speaker placement. Now, whilst I would not disagree with such sentiments my experience over the last few years has slightly altered my view (I already use room treatments and have very carefully positioned speakers).
A few years ago I came across a chap making replacement circuit boards/cards - for my Naim pre-amp. These used the original Naim circuit but allowed for all the Acoustica mods to be implemented; I liked these a lot and thought they showed promise and a friend also bought a set. Now, my friend was very into component experimentation at the time and he tried a large number of different makes of capacitors and resistors to populate his boards. Each time he made a change that he thought promising, he brought them over to my house and we A/B compared his boards to mine (it is very easy to swap specific parts of the circuitry on the Nac72). If I also liked the change I made the change to my boards and so it progressed for a few months (I did not always make a change). At the end I was happy with the changes wrought. The upper mid was now a lot more open but no less dynamic; but the biggest change was in the way the very top end was rendered. This was now quite a lot more delicate and airy with significantly better tonal differentiation - but, the surprise was that the stereo imagery was significantly better. Particularly in terms of localisation side to side and instruments seemed to exist much more in their own acoustic space.
In the past I had thought that the ability to reproduce very low frequencies would aid stereo. When I integrated a sub into my system the sense of hall acoustic did certainly improve (as did apparent depth) but general imagery was not significantly altered. Now I wonder if it is not the way that the very final decay of a note is handled that does not impact more significantly on imagery in general.
Yesterday, I was reminded of all of this as I had just changed the loading on my phonostage. On the design I use this can only be achieved by physically de-soldering a resistor and a capacitor and changing them. So, I swapped a pair of Vishay bulk foil resistors for a pair of Charcroft resistors (that I was kindly given) and changed a couple of styrene caps for another pair of styrene caps (although the replacements were significantly physically bigger for some reason - despite being a smaller value). I didn't really expect much from this mod and half expected to have to reverse it. As it has turned out though, I am quite surprised by how much difference it has made. One again, I am particularly struck by the apparent subjective improvement in stereo placement of instruments. Sounds seem to come more readily from the speaker boundaries (and slightly beyond) and spacing of instruments in the foreground seems more pronounced. Ironically, stereo imagery is not one of the qualities I consider particularly important and I was happy enough with it before any of these changes were made.
I wonder if anyone else has encountered similar improvements to stereo imagery when improvements to the reproduction of the upper registers has been made?
_____________________
P.S. Just in case anyone senses a marketing conspiracy, let me make it clear that I am not involved in any way (financially or design) with any of the equipment or mods I have described.
A few years ago I came across a chap making replacement circuit boards/cards - for my Naim pre-amp. These used the original Naim circuit but allowed for all the Acoustica mods to be implemented; I liked these a lot and thought they showed promise and a friend also bought a set. Now, my friend was very into component experimentation at the time and he tried a large number of different makes of capacitors and resistors to populate his boards. Each time he made a change that he thought promising, he brought them over to my house and we A/B compared his boards to mine (it is very easy to swap specific parts of the circuitry on the Nac72). If I also liked the change I made the change to my boards and so it progressed for a few months (I did not always make a change). At the end I was happy with the changes wrought. The upper mid was now a lot more open but no less dynamic; but the biggest change was in the way the very top end was rendered. This was now quite a lot more delicate and airy with significantly better tonal differentiation - but, the surprise was that the stereo imagery was significantly better. Particularly in terms of localisation side to side and instruments seemed to exist much more in their own acoustic space.
In the past I had thought that the ability to reproduce very low frequencies would aid stereo. When I integrated a sub into my system the sense of hall acoustic did certainly improve (as did apparent depth) but general imagery was not significantly altered. Now I wonder if it is not the way that the very final decay of a note is handled that does not impact more significantly on imagery in general.
Yesterday, I was reminded of all of this as I had just changed the loading on my phonostage. On the design I use this can only be achieved by physically de-soldering a resistor and a capacitor and changing them. So, I swapped a pair of Vishay bulk foil resistors for a pair of Charcroft resistors (that I was kindly given) and changed a couple of styrene caps for another pair of styrene caps (although the replacements were significantly physically bigger for some reason - despite being a smaller value). I didn't really expect much from this mod and half expected to have to reverse it. As it has turned out though, I am quite surprised by how much difference it has made. One again, I am particularly struck by the apparent subjective improvement in stereo placement of instruments. Sounds seem to come more readily from the speaker boundaries (and slightly beyond) and spacing of instruments in the foreground seems more pronounced. Ironically, stereo imagery is not one of the qualities I consider particularly important and I was happy enough with it before any of these changes were made.
I wonder if anyone else has encountered similar improvements to stereo imagery when improvements to the reproduction of the upper registers has been made?
_____________________
P.S. Just in case anyone senses a marketing conspiracy, let me make it clear that I am not involved in any way (financially or design) with any of the equipment or mods I have described.
Last edited by a moderator: