Taming a supertweeter

Discussion in 'DIY Discussion' started by Parkandbike, Jun 27, 2007.

  1. Parkandbike

    Parkandbike

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2006
    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    0
    This may seem a trivial question to real DIYers, but this seemed the best place to ask it.

    I'm running Quad ESL 63s which are notoriously a little dull at the top end. Recently I had a chance to acquire some JAS Supertweeters. Despite the two technologues (ESL dipole and Ribbon monopole) with the JAS set to come in at 16Khz, the effect on some recordings is wonderful- on others it is not. My overall impresion is that the supertweeters are too loud and I'd like to turn them down a little. (Doing a little checking, the Quads are said to be 85 dB/W/M and and JASs 96 dB/W/M, so my impression may have some basis in measurement- although I realise the measurements can only be a guide given the different radiation patterns)

    Unfortunately the supertweeters do not have a volume control, hence my questions:

    1) Would it be OK simply to put a resistor in series with the supertweeter- or do I risk screwing something up?

    2) The JASs are said to be an 8ohm design. Does that mean an 8ohm resistor in series would cut the output level by about half? (I can never remember whether that is -3dB or -6dB). In practice I expect to find the right level on a "suck-it-and-see" basis, but it woudl be nice to be in the righr ball park.

    3) What power rating would I need for the resistor? I think the crow-bars on the Quads cut-in at around 8.5V, so I could take this as a sensible upper limit.

    The JASs are in parallel to the Quads. Does this mean that at this volume setting and with no resistor in line the JAS would be drawing around 1 amp? Or with an 8ohm in series it would be passing around 0.5 amp?

    This would seem to imply a resistor rated for around 4-8 watts which seems a higher rating than most at Maplin! (I ended up with rectangular lumps of what looks like marble- and is presumably ceramic- with a wire sticking out each end!) Perhaps my maths or my assumptions are at fault somewhere. I've simply been using V=IR and Power =VI (It's been a long time since I was at school. I realise AC is not the same as DC, but not what to do about it!)

    I'd be grateful for the advice of any speaker builders out there.

    Many thanks in advance
     
    Parkandbike, Jun 27, 2007
    #1
  2. Parkandbike

    dean.l

    Joined:
    May 1, 2006
    Messages:
    194
    Likes Received:
    1
    look up "L pad"
    or I am sure one of the guys on here will have a suitable design.
     
    dean.l, Jun 27, 2007
    #2
  3. Parkandbike

    felix part-time Horta

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2003
    Messages:
    757
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    dead
    SPot-on , a L-pad is what you want.

    In the very high treble there's very little power available, regular 0.6W metal film resistors will be just fine for trials until you decide the values you need, after which you can swap them for 2/3W metal film parts
     
    felix, Jun 27, 2007
    #3
  4. Parkandbike

    Tenson Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2003
    Messages:
    5,947
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Kent, UK
    Hi,

    Out of interest, where did you acquire the JAS?

    And yes, an L-pad is what you want. This should help http://www.lalena.com/Audio/Calculator/LPad/

    Though, you should be aware that the 8R impedance rating of the JAS is only a nominal rating, the actual impedance curve will vary so the calculator will only get you close.
     
    Tenson, Jun 27, 2007
    #4
  5. Parkandbike

    dreftar

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    490
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Shetland Islands
    "with the JAS set to come in at 16Khz,"

    At my advanced years Im not sure that I can actually much above 16Khz which probably explains why I enjoy the top end of my ESL 63s. For the first time since I moved on from valve radios in the 60's I have a top end without tizz. It took some getting used to tho' but now I am delighted with the clarity and imaging of the ESL 63s and especially the mid - top end.

    Good luck with tweeters but if you add a resistance to circuit with capacitance and impedance you will have created a tuned circuit that might colour the sound etc
     
    dreftar, Jun 28, 2007
    #5
  6. Parkandbike

    Parkandbike

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2006
    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, I'm getting on a bit myself and have noticed a that my ability to hear higher frequencies is diminishing. Nevertheless I can hear these on that setting (I don't know how sharp the cross-over is).

    At the risk of starting another contentious debate, with my current set up SACD (especially when recorded in DSD) is clearly superior to CD (although some CDs sound very good) and it feels that a lot of the difference is in these highest frequencies.

    The Quads have very nice sound and I was extremely sceptical about the supertweeter, but it does make the sound more airy. To use adapt Peter Walker's description, its like moving forward in the auditorium.

    However on some recordings the effect is too much it can be pleasant, but unrealistic or it can be unpleasant with just a little too much emphasis on the higher frequencies.

    On reflection I think the "unpleasant" recordings have all been with CD rather than my, much more limited, collection of SACDs. Perhaps I should experiment with the CD players filter settings before trying to reduce the level of the super-tweeter

    Many thanks to all who made suggestions about reducing the output of these speakers. It's now time to experiment.
     
    Parkandbike, Jun 30, 2007
    #6
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.