yes, the acoustics are long, but the sound is somewhat muddled. What is more, the sound is muddled but the trumpets are shrill and aggressive. (This does not concern the recording of Bruckner, but Bat's remark: the organ is extremely strong -I mean the big one, not the more recent, which I have never listened to-, almost too loud for my taste, and polyphony is quite impossible there; but then I like polyphony in smallish organs).
But I think I am getting very confused about Bruckner's 8th - I seem to prefer Bohm's versions. I have three of them. As to Wand, I find his third version (the one before the last) the best of all - contrary to all people.
I had Tintner's, which is interesting because it is the first version. But I did not like his conducting, although the idea of separating the first and second violins work very well.
More to that, the Nowak and Hass editions do not really change much to the overall sense of the music: they are, I think, equivalent. The first version is quite different, but I wish there was a more objective version, less 'mystical'

than Tintner's.
I'll keep reporting, but Bohm's versions are really, I think, the best introduction to the work. One of them has a problem in the last movement (the brasses, at the beginning, are out of tempo), but the fastest one (released in 'Great Conductors of the 20th Century) and the DGG one are marvelous: cantabile but 'nicht schleppend'. And, of course, there is Wand's last, which almost smells of death (which I don't like but still impresses me a great deal).
What do you all think? Would a Bruckner thread interest people? Or am I again delving into obscure and yawning subjects?