I listen mainly on headphones, largely because I think they are more cost-effective than speakers, giving more acoustic information for the same cost. I am told by dealers that in my circumstances I really ought to use a headphone amp rather than the socket on an ordinary amp- but I auditioned one at a dealer and noticed no improvement over using the headphone socket of my ordinary amp. I also could not really understand the high prices, as I'm sure a headphone amp cannot require the expensive components required to supply high power to loudspeakers. I use a very old amp, a Cambridge Audio P25, believe it or not, though I have owned more recent amps and discarded them because the P25 sounds better, to my ears. In fact the sound that I am listening to right now (into low impedance 'phones) I find really superb, and I can't imagine it can be much improved (though of course one has imagined that quite a few times before and been badly wrong!). Now are all these dealers and hi-fi mags correct, and I'm missing out? Or are headphone amps a reaction to built-in modern headphone amps that are not up to the same standard as those of a previous generation? And if so, why so expensive? One can buy a decent enough phono stage quite cheaply (I have a cracking one for the P25), but even the cheapest headphone amp costs much more. From where I'm sitting, it looks as though one is having to spend for a headphone amp as much as one would pay for a whole integrated amp just to get the same quality that yesteryear was available from integrated amps for no extra cost. On advice from the industry, some people used to simply put a couple of resistors to a speaker socket and get good enough sound, apparently. [I]Cheaper[/I] than a Graham Slee, anyway! I'm sure it can't be that simple, but I'm equally sure I don't understand the reason.