RobHolt
Moderator
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2004
- Messages
- 4,126
- Reaction score
- 12
Unfortunately, hifi forum audiophiles do seem to have a problem with what others enjoy. Here's one example:
http://www.pinkfishmedia.net/forum/showthread.php?t=94191&page=11
Personally, I need some sort of evidence that there's an acoustical, mechanical or electrical relationship between one entity/adjustment or another before I'll be willing to buy into what's experienced (assuming I even hear a difference) but if some group of folks want to discuss how freezing photographs changed the sound of their rigs and their lives, I'm not going to disrupt their discussion -I simply won't participate.
LP12 discussions don't count Dave - they break all the rules
But yes, I know what you mean.
I do think it important to participate in a discussion if you believe what has been written is clearly inaccurate, mainly because the claims are public and have a potentially large audience. However, just being negative isn't good enough and it must surely be important to present a cogent argument to support your position in such instances.