sideshowbob
Trisha
When I went to university, back in 1983, it was expected that undergraduates would start to produce original research by the end of their first year (this was in the philosophy department, other depts may have had different policies). Anyone expecting to get a 2.1 or better had to have read a lot and developed enough to be writing pretty challenging and original stuff by the time they reached the third year.
I don't see the same standards today, TBH. Most philosophy syllabuses I see nowadays seem to have adopted the modular approach of the old polytechnics - this term students "do" subjects A, B and C, next term, D, E, and F, where "doing" the subject seems to mean reading a few overview textbooks about it.
I don't like elitism, but the old status of universities was a good one, I think: universities were supposed to be institutions primarily devoted to encouraging original research, amongst both staff and students. That seems to be disappearing fast.
-- Ian
I don't see the same standards today, TBH. Most philosophy syllabuses I see nowadays seem to have adopted the modular approach of the old polytechnics - this term students "do" subjects A, B and C, next term, D, E, and F, where "doing" the subject seems to mean reading a few overview textbooks about it.
I don't like elitism, but the old status of universities was a good one, I think: universities were supposed to be institutions primarily devoted to encouraging original research, amongst both staff and students. That seems to be disappearing fast.
-- Ian