The Devil
IHTFP
What's known for sure is that there is no evidence at all that divining works. That means you are just as likely to find water if you dig at random.
What's known for sure is that there is no evidence at all that divining works. That means you are just as likely to find water if you dig at random.
So, which oil company uses divining to find oil? 'A fact' is usually, you know, factual.It is fact though, as you yourself have observed, that dowsing is frequently used in many highly responsible applications.......such as oil exporation .....and the like.
So, which oil company uses divining to find oil? 'A fact' is usually, you know, factual.
How do you reconcile your claim with the actual fact that every rigorous trial of diviners has shown that they are mistaken?
Paul
No real evidence tho is it, just some chap who says he find water with a bent welding rod. People say they can hear plants talking....
Cetainly no proof.
Names Andy btw![]()
What stupid arguement this is.
When I are you going to understand.......I really don't need to!
come on guys, surely science has an answer to everything!!!
A Balanced Response to the Anti-Divining Rhetoric of E.H. Boudreau.
http://www.drilshop.com/holes/bates1.html
Schroter worked alongside professional Hydrogeologists on a variety of groundwater development projects in Sri Lanka, the Philippines, the Dominican Republic, Congo, Niger, Yemen, Cape Verde Islands, Kenya, Namibia, and the Sinai peninsula in Egypt; to locate over 2000 boreholes with project success rates ranging from 80% to 96%....even in these desert areas where the comparable conventional methods achieved success rates of only 10 to 50%.......... Schroter proved to be more successful than the Hydrogeology team by a factor of 4X !
what would be the point for wishing it not to work....?
You haven't posted anything that challenges my assertion.
And one wonders why Herr Schroter hasn't taken Randi for his $1000000.
Paul
Herr Schroter would obviously have used the $1000000 for good causes.
Paul